Central Oregon Web Log
Support Mercy Corps
HOME
ACT NOW
ANNEXATION
ASIA

Afghanistan

India

Pakistan

CAPITALISM
CAMPAIGN FINANCE
CENTRAL OREGON
CIVIL RIGHTS
Voting
CONSUMER ISSUES
CORPORATIONS
ECONOMIC JUSTICE
Minimum Wage
ECONOMICS
Taxes  Oregon Economy
EDUCATION
School Funding
ENERGY
ENVIRONMENT
Water
ETHICS
EVENTS IN CENTRAL OREGON
HEALTH
Medicare
HISTORY
HUMAN RIGHTS
HUMANITY
INTERNET
JUSTICE
LANGUAGE IN POLITICS
LATIN AMERICA
El Salvador
LINKS

   International

MEDIA
Bloggers  Books  Columnists  International  Mainstream  Media Watch  Oregon  Progressive  Radio and TV  
MIDDLE EAST

Iran  Iraq  Israel-Palestine  Saudi Arabia

MILITARY
OREGON
PEACE AND ANTI-WAR
PEOPLE
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
REFERENCE
RESEARCH AND ANALYSIS
SOCIAL SECURITY
SPYWARE
SUPPORT THESE TROOPS
TAKE ACTION
TERRORISM
UNITED STATES
Bush Watch  Federal Offices
WAR

School bonds and ethics

This letter by Bill Bodden was submitted to The Redmond Spokesman in January 2002

I am not quite sure what Mary Krakow means by "the power of education" and "the power of community." (Step up to support schools - 1/30/02) However, we would probably agree that a good education for children is important and that people should contribute to their community’s common good.

Krakow believes that Americans have found a new sense of community following September 11th. We would like to believe that this new spirit will endure, but recent evidence suggests otherwise and a preference for taking care of number one will again prevail.

Not all voters rejected the previous Redmond school bond for selfish reasons or indifference to community. Some cast their first ever votes against a school bond for perfectly valid reasons, one of which involved an ethical question that probably never crossed the minds of bond supporters or, if it did, was rejected by them. Is it right to vote for a tax increase to improve schools if that increase means greater hardship to others already living in straitened circumstances?

The controversy surrounding system development costs and their offsetting charges provides evidence of a practice that negates community spirit. New home construction creates school and other infrastructure costs, but developers, builders and new home buyers, aided and abetted by community leaders, only pay a small portion of these costs. The community’s modus operandum foists most of the costs on residents, some of whom are already heavily burdened just trying to make ends meet. Harmony cannot exist in a community with unfair policies that benefit some members while causing hardship to others.

Children’s education and community spirit would be enhanced if all concerned debated openly and honestly the ethical question posed above.

Back to Education Home Page     Back to Schools Home Page

Top of Page

Support the Humane Society of Central Oregon and The Humane Society of Redmond