Central Oregon Web Log
Support Mercy Corps
HOME
ACT NOW
ANNEXATION
ASIA

Afghanistan

India

Pakistan

CAPITALISM
CAMPAIGN FINANCE
CENTRAL OREGON
CIVIL RIGHTS
Voting
CONSUMER ISSUES
CORPORATIONS
ECONOMIC JUSTICE
Minimum Wage
ECONOMICS
Taxes  Oregon Economy
EDUCATION
School Funding
ENERGY
ENVIRONMENT
Water
ETHICS
EVENTS IN CENTRAL OREGON
HEALTH
Medicare
HISTORY
HUMAN RIGHTS
HUMANITY
INTERNET
JUSTICE
LANGUAGE IN POLITICS
LATIN AMERICA
El Salvador
LINKS

   International

MEDIA
Bloggers  Books  Columnists  International  Mainstream  Media Watch  Oregon  Progressive  Radio and TV  
MIDDLE EAST

Iran  Iraq  Israel-Palestine  Saudi Arabia

MILITARY
OREGON
PEACE AND ANTI-WAR
PEOPLE
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
REFERENCE
RESEARCH AND ANALYSIS
SOCIAL SECURITY
SPYWARE
SUPPORT THESE TROOPS
TAKE ACTION
TERRORISM
UNITED STATES
Bush Watch  Federal Offices
WAR

Redmond schools past and present

This letter by Bill Bodden of Redmond was submitted to The (Bend) Bulletin in July 2002

Presumably your (John Costa) column (July 7th) on the need for school upgrades in Redmond was addressed to the voting residents of the Redmond school district. A more useful exercise would be to address another version of your column to the various officials involved in spending funds that the taxpayers might authorize.

Your column refers to a level of intelligence and judiciousness that went into the construction of the original Redmond high school (now Evergreen Elementary) that appears to have been lacking during the last decade in Redmond and may continue as such in 2002.

Consideration of Evergreen Elementary and more recent construction will help to illustrate my point. There is an architectural rule of thumb that says that a square, multi-story building is less expensive to build and maintain than a one-story building spread over a larger area. The latter design becomes much more costly when gratuitous cathedral roofs are part of the design to satisfy the egos of architects and officials. Evergreen is a model of judicious design; all other schools in the Redmond school district are anything but.

There is also the question of acreage allotted to each school. I believe it would have been better to be a little more generous with land for recreational purposes for Evergreen, but the campuses at most of the other schools are excessive. Presumably, sports addicts will not agree with this, but I am inclined to believe that others that believe schools are primarily for education will agree with my position.

There are other problems that promoters of the new school bond need to address if the bond is to pass. Suffice it to say at this time that I agree completely with Frank Smith in his letter regarding SDCs for schools published on the letters page of the Perspective section.

To sum my position on this issue, I am in favor of providing the young people of Redmond with the facilities they need to get a good education. I am, however, not in favor of conducting business as usual.

Back to Education Home Page     Back to Schools Home Page

Top of Page

Support the Humane Society of Central Oregon and The Humane Society of Redmond